Review Guidelines

General

Detail

Title: Effectiveness, Specification, and clarity
Abstract: Complete and describe the essence of an article
Keywords: Describing the essential concept of an article
Introduction: Up-to-date, originality, the relevance of the Topic, compatibility of the important reason of the research object
Research Method: Has to emphasize on procedure and data analysis for an empiric study
Result: Analysis accurateness
Findings: Up-to-date finding, relevance to the interrelated researchers, and the scientific contribution effect of finding /idea to the development of science
Conclusion: Logical, valid, brief, and clear
Suggestion: For practical action, development of new theory, and next/advanced research, Picture/Table: Center located, Not cut, Good quality to viewed, Picture/table title, Referred with a capital letter
Bibliography: The degree of up-to-date and the reference to primary book sources. Rules: minimum 80% of the journals or the interrelated scientific researchers, above 2007 (year); the number of book sources minimum 10; minimum 80% in the text/material of art.

Full Review Process of Manuscript

Writing: Is the manuscript easy to follow, that is, has a logical progression and evident organization?
Is the manuscript concise and understandable? Any parts that should be reduced,
Eliminated/expanded/added?
Note if there are major problems with mechanics: grammar, punctuation, spelling. (If there are just a few places that aren’t worded well or correctly, make a note to tell the author the specific places. If there are consistent problems throughout, only select an example or two if need be- don’t try and edit the whole thing).
Abbreviations: Used judiciously and are composed such that reader won’t have trouble remembering what an abbreviation represents.
Follows style, format and other rules of the journal.
Citations are provided when providing evidence-based information from outside sources.

Categories Decision